New Release: Queen Anna by Tony Riches

  Author Tony Riches has a new release... A crown won in the eye of a storm. A queen who refuses to be broken... Princess Anna of Denmark s...

Showing posts with label 1066. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1066. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 October 2021

Why did Harold Godwineson go to Normandy - by Helen Hollick

 As we continue our tour of Saxon England, Helen is my guest today on this, the anniversary of the battle of Hastings:



Why did Harold Godwineson go to Normandy?
by Helen Hollick

The Battle of Hastings. 14th October 1066 - probably the most famous date in English history. (Funnily enough, the next most famous is also a '66' - 1666, the Great Fire of London.) The battle came about because Duke William of Normandy considered that he had been promised the throne of England by Edward the Confessor, probably in circa 1052 when the Godwine family were exiled, and Edward was favouring his Norman friends. The Duke, William, was Edward's kindred - his Great Aunt, Queen Emma, was Edward's mother. So, with Edward as yet childless and with no obvious heir to the throne, Bill probably thought he was in with a good chance.

Earl Godwine and his family, one of whom was Harold, Earl of East Anglia, reclaimed their positions of authority and Edward's Norman mates scuttled back to Normandy (where they belonged) with Earl Godwine's youngest son, Wulfnoth, and grandson, Hakon, as hostages.

Now, if Edward had made such a promise it would have been totally void because England, the Anglo-Saxons, did things very differently back then. The king was chosen by the council, the Witan. Elected. Best man for the job. Yes, usually this would have been the eldest son, the aethling, but it would have been highly unlikely that William would have been considered.

Skip forward ten or so years.

In 1063 or '64 Harold, now Earl of Wessex, went to Normandy. We do not know why, but we know (sort of) what happened because the events are recorded in the Bayeux Tapestry (which is actually an embroidery, not a tapestry.)

The Normans, after 1066, claimed that Harold went as an envoy of King Edward (who by now was getting old and frail) and to re-iterate William's role as heir. Again - highly unlikely! Given that his brother and nephew were still being held as hostages, is it not more logical that Harold went to get them back?

Harold boarding a ship bound for Normandy
at his home at Bosham Sussex
- note the steps...


and here's my friend James
sitting on very similar steps
 at Bosham in the 21st century!

Things went awry, however, for his ship was blown off course and he ended up a prisoner of one of William's neighbours, Guy de Ponthieu ... no matter, the Duke, with much indignation, secured Harold's release. From there on, the visit seemed quite congenial, Harold even accompanied William on campaign into Brittany, seeing at first-hand how the Normans fought (and how ruthless William was - he was known as 'Bastard' for both uses of the word.)

Again, we know all this because of the Tapestry, which includes a scene where Harold rescues two men from drowning in the river Cousenon, at  Mont Saint Michel. (The tide  comes in faster than a man can run there...)
Here Harold is rescuing two men
from the river

Eventually, it was time to go home, but William would not allow this until Harold had sworn an oath of allegiance... sworn to support William's claim to England.

Harold was forced to swear
while touching holy relics

The thing is ... William tricked Harold. He was made to swear a holy oath, to swear to God, BUT an oath made under duress is not a binding oath. If Harold hadn't sworn, would he, and his men, ever have seen their freedom again? Add to that, in Anglo-Saxon times a lord would forfeit his honour if he did not protect the men who loyally served him. What was the greater? To swear an unbinding oath under duress, with no choice but to make it, or to swear, falsely, in order to save the freedom - or lives - of your faithful followers?

Harold had no choice. He swore the oath, and did, indeed return to England with his nephew, Hakon.

Wulfnoth was never to see his freedom again. And Hakon died  alongside Harold, at the great battle of Hastings.

History, the year 1066 might have been entirely different if Harold had not gone to Normandy. On the other hand, because he did go, because he accompanied William on campaign, Harold knew exactly what Duke William was like. Knew he was obsessive - and ruthless. Knew that he would have to keep the Norman Duke out of England at all cost -whatever the cost, and whatever he had to do...

Read the entire story:

Harold the King (UK & Australia)
I Am The Chosen King (US & Canada)
(same book - different title)

About Helen:

Helen Hollick and her family moved from north-east London in January 2013 after finding an eighteenth-century North Devon farm house through being a ‘victim’ on BBC TV’s popular Escape To The Country show. The thirteen-acre property was the first one she was shown – and it was love at first sight. She enjoys her new rural life, and has a variety of animals on the farm, including Exmoor ponies and her daughter’s string of show jumpers.

First accepted for publication by William Heinemann in 1993 – a week after her fortieth birthday – Helen then became a USA Today Bestseller with her historical novel, The Forever Queen (titled A Hollow Crown in the UK) with the sequel, Harold the King (US: I Am The Chosen King) being novels that explore the events that led to the Battle of Hastings in 1066. Her Pendragon’s Banner Trilogy is a fifth-century version of the Arthurian legend, and she also writes a pirate-based nautical adventure/fantasy series, The Sea Witch Voyages. Despite being impaired by the visual disorder of Glaucoma, she is also branching out into the quick read novella, 'Cosy Mystery' genre with the Jan Christopher Mysteries, set in the 1970s, with the first in the series, A Mirror Murder incorporating her, often hilarious, memories of working for thirteen years as a library assistant.

Her non-fiction books are Pirates: Truth and Tales and Life of A Smuggler. She also runs Discovering Diamonds, a review blog for historical fiction, a news and events blog for her village and the Community Shop, assists as ‘secretary for the day’ at her daughter’s regular showjumping shows – and occasionally gets time to write... 

Website: https://helenhollick.net/

Amazon Author Page: https://viewauthor.at/HelenHollick 

Blog: https://ofhistoryandkings.blogspot.com/

Twitter: @HelenHollick

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HelenHollick

Newsletter Subscription: http://tinyletter.com/HelenHollick

Monday, 11 October 2021

Stepping Back into Saxon England: What If? by Helen Hollick

 

Stepping Back into Saxon England
What If?
By Helen Hollick


WHAT IF...? by Helen Hollick


1066 Turned Upside Down, is a short  story collection of alternative stories for the events of that year – the year of King Harold II’s coronation, the year of the Battle of Hastings and the Norman Conquest of England.

Written by nine different authors – including myself and co-blog-tourist Annie Whitehead – these stories explore what might have happened if William the Conqueror had been beaten at Hastings, if Harald Hardrada had won at Stamford Bridge or if Edward the Confessor had died with an heir ready to take his crown. 1066 Turned Upside Down explores a variety of ways in which that momentous year could have played out very differently.

But what if things had been different before 1066? How far back do we go to alter the course of history to erase the Norman Conquest? What if history was different after 1066?

Where to start!

Things might have been different if Boudica had beaten Rome during her great rebellion in AD 60 or 61, although I suspect that Rome would have come back in greater force. What if there had not been the Anglo-Saxon migration in the early sixth century? (Contrary to ‘old fashioned’ thinking, these Germanic tribes did not come in hoards to rape, pillage and drive the local Brits into Wales... settlement took several generations of mostly peaceful integration between the two populations.) What if they ‘went south’ instead? To what is now France and Spain? (Much better weather than England!) Again, though, it is probable that they would have still come, maybe 100 years or so later, and perhaps already converted to Christianity.

Ah, there’s another one! What if the Romans/Britons/ Saxons/Vikings had not converted to Christianity? What if the Faith hadn’t spread, had fizzled out before it even got started? Apart from a lot of hungry lions, we would not have our grand cathedrals – nor our Western way of life (no divorce entanglements for Henry VIII!) Would the dominant religion now be Pagan, Jewish, Muslim, Hindi...? No Christianity = no Crusades. No glory for Richard the Lionheart ... ah, but if there had not been a Norman Conquest, there would have been no Plantagenets anyway.

Tomb of Richard I

What if the Vikings had not happened, or they had not thought this little, often very wet Isle, worth bothering with? If there had been no Christianity, and no churches, this is entirely feasible. The Vikings came for the plunder. The gold and riches in our churches. (Although, perhaps alternative faiths still had the riches – so they might still have come.)

What if - assuming, so far that history had not changed and Duke William had seized England for himself - what if Mathilda, daughter of Henry I had been crowned as Queen? No civil war between her and Stephen. But then Henry II, her son, would still have become King.

the spread of the Black Death

What if there had been no Black Death in 1348/49? (The term ‘Black Death’ was not used until the late 17th century.) As Wikipedia states: "The most immediate consequence was a halt to the campaigns of the Hundred Years' War. In the long term, the decrease in population caused a shortage of labour, with subsequent rise in wages, resisted by the landowners, which caused deep resentment among the lower classes. The Peasants' Revolt of 1381 was largely a result of this resentment, and even though the rebellion was suppressed, in the long term serfdom was ended in England. The Black Death also affected artistic and cultural efforts, and may have helped advance the use of the vernacular.

So thus ended the consequence of the Norman Conquest, and the rise of English used instead of French and Latin among the higher classes, government and the church. But there probably would have been another plague... (as we well know 2020 - Covid 19!)

No Wars of the Roses maybe? Richard III won at Bosworth, so no Tudors – one main result being England would have remained Catholic. Or Katherine of Aragon had borne a healthy son? Meaning no reign of Mary Tudor or  Elizabeth I. (A lot of people would have stayed alive with no burnings and beheadings of Catholics or Protestants.) Spain might have triumphed with their Armada, so no Stuarts on the English throne. I reckon the Protestants wouldn’t have fared so well, though.

In turn, no English Civil Wars. Charles I reigned to a ripe old age, no Oliver Cromwell (although his ideas didn’t survive anyway, so maybe we can discount that era of history). Charles II might have had a son, so exit William and Mary. (I was talking to a young friend, also called William, about these two. We decided that as William was William of Orange, Mary must have been Mary of Marmalade.)

Or perhaps the Duke of Monmouth would have won at Sedgemoor in 1685. If any one of Queen Anne’s children had survived – no George of Hanover.

James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth

Ah, no George III! No war of Independence with those Colonials across the Atlantic! Maybe Britain and the United States would still be conjoined? America's monarch would be Elizabeth II? There again, slavery would still have happened because of tobacco, sugar, cotton... the Industrial revolution continued to roll... but maybe no Queen Victoria? No Albert... no Albert Hall in London. Would we still have Christmas trees?

"That pretty German toy, a Christmas tree" (1848),
The Illustrated London News

I’ll stop there, but I find it interesting that we would probably still have Queen Elizabeth II as our monarch. Let’s assume Edward VIII had not abdicated in 1936, had still married Wallis Simpson.

In ‘real’ life they had no children, so when he died in 1972 his successor would have been ... Elizabeth II.

 What other 'what if's' - feel free to leave a comment and share your ideas!

Buy the book
from Amazon
now also available in paperback

(images from Wikipedia)

About Helen:

Helen Hollick and her family moved from north-east London in January 2013 after finding an eighteenth-century North Devon farm house through being a ‘victim’ on BBC TV’s popular Escape To The Country show. The thirteen-acre property was the first one she was shown – and it was love at first sight. She enjoys her new rural life, and has a variety of animals on the farm, including Exmoor ponies and her daughter’s string of show jumpers.

First accepted for publication by William Heinemann in 1993 – a week after her fortieth birthday – Helen then became a USA Today Bestseller with her historical novel, The Forever Queen (titled A Hollow Crown in the UK) with the sequel, Harold the King (US: I Am The Chosen King) being novels that explore the events that led to the Battle of Hastings in 1066. Her Pendragon’s Banner Trilogy is a fifth-century version of the Arthurian legend, and she also writes a pirate-based nautical adventure/fantasy series, The Sea Witch Voyages. Despite being impaired by the visual disorder of Glaucoma, she is also branching out into the quick read novella, 'Cosy Mystery' genre with the Jan Christopher Mysteries, set in the 1970s, with the first in the series, A Mirror Murder incorporating her, often hilarious, memories of working for thirteen years as a library assistant.

Her non-fiction books are Pirates: Truth and Tales and Life of A Smuggler. She also runs Discovering Diamonds, a review blog for historical fiction, a news and events blog for her village and the Community Shop, assists as ‘secretary for the day’ at her daughter’s regular showjumping shows – and occasionally gets time to write... 

Website: https://helenhollick.net/

Amazon Author Page: https://viewauthor.at/HelenHollick 

Blog: https://ofhistoryandkings.blogspot.com/

Twitter: @HelenHollick

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HelenHollick

Newsletter Subscription: http://tinyletter.com/HelenHollick

Sunday, 3 January 2021

Authors who help Authors: Helen Hollick & Discovering Diamonds

Welcome to the first in a short series turning the spotlight on authors who help other authors.

There are many ways that writers can support each other and offering reviews is one of them.


Discovering Diamonds (#DDRevs) was the brainchild of Helen Hollick, a prolific and successful author in her own right, who set up Discovering Diamonds a few years ago to provide a platform for reviews of historical novels.


To kick off the series, I chatted to Helen and asked her to explain what it's all about.

AW: Welcome to the blog Helen. Can I start by asking what inspired you to set up Discovering Diamonds and how does it work?

HH: I had been the Managing Editor for Indie Reviews for the Historical Novel Association for over five years, but in 2016 I felt it time to establish something a little more independent that had a major focus on indie and self-published authors, rather than traditional mainstream. Most of my previous review team came with me – a super group of people made up of dedicated readers, authors and editors –  and so Discovering Diamonds came into being on January 1st 2017.

I had no intention of getting involved with any finances, nor with receiving or posting out physical copies of novels – technology has advanced enough with e-editions to eliminate costly sending of actual books. Plus, the majority of readers prefer a Kindle (or similar device) where reviewing is concerned, so I request mobi (preferably) or  correctly formatted PDF ARC files. (These only go out to selected reviewers and are deleted after being read.)

Our aim is to promote good books worth reading regardless of whether it is written by an indie author or someone established with a well-known publishing company. I do not even ask for, or include, a publisher’s details as a good book is a good book no matter who published it or how! We publish three reviews a week, and these are all four or five-star standard.  


AW: To have one's book declared a Diamond is a badge of honour, I know, but why do you think independent reviews are so important for Indie Authors especially?

HH: Even after all this time, indie and self-published novels are still (erroneously!) regarded as ‘vanity’ and of little worth. Indie writers are, all too often, not taken seriously as authors – alas literary snobbishness is still rife. With better technology, ease of access to professional editors, cover designers and formatters etc there is no reason why a good writer cannot produce a good book. The disadvantage is that most indie writers have a small budget and no access to nation- or even world-wide marketing. No book, no matter how superb it is, will sell if no one knows about it. 

Social Media platforms are an indie author’s shop window, but even then word of mouth about good books worth reading is essential. This is where honest, constructive, reviews come into play.

Yes, at Discovering Diamonds we will say if we felt a book was a brilliant story, but could do with another edit, or that there were a few too many typos. We also like to encourage new authors – maybe this first novel could do with some more polishing but the author has potential, so watch this space for Book Two! 

I post a link on Twitter and Facebook to each review, and where I can, copy the entire review on Amazon.co.uk and Goodreads. (Alas I can no longer do so on .com as well.)

AW: It's a great and generous way to help authors feel that they're not alone out there in the Indie publishing world. I happen to know however that reviews aren't the only way #DDRevs helps authors. Can you tell us a little about some of the other features of the site?)

HH: Every December I like to take a break from posting reviews, so I invite authors to submit a short story. The first year the theme was to be ‘diamonds’ (for obvious reasons) but then I hit on the idea of stories connected to a song... why is Daniel leaving on a plane? Who is dreaming of a white Christmas? Who is making a telephone call to say ‘Hello?’ These stories were not to be about the song, but inspired by it. An added twist was that the reader would read the story and guess which song inspired it... the authors involved have grown quite adept at hiding the clues!

I also have Guest Spots on Sundays, featuring authors and their books, a cover and book selection of the month (and then of the year) – and anything else I can think of to help promote authors.



AW: What about your own writing? Can you tell people a little about your own books (I believe you've branched off in a new and exciting direction very recently and the picture to the left is a bit of a clue...) 


HH: I have been a published author since 1994, with a few historical novels under my belt and a nautical adventure series – the Sea Witch Voyages (Voyage six is in progress, although slowly) I’ve written nonfiction about pirates and smugglers, and have now diversified into the realm of the ‘cosy mystery’. 

A Mirror Murder is the first in the Jan Christopher Mystery series. It is set in the 1970s and based around my thirteen years of experience working in a London suburb public library ... believe me, I have a lot of anecdotes, although I confess, not one single murder – that bit is entirely made up! Jan is my library assistant protagonist, her uncle and guardian is DCI Toby Christopher ... and the action starts when he introduces Jan to his new young Detective Constable, Laurie Walker... I hope readers enjoy reading it as much as I did writing it!

AW: I'm delighted to say that I've read an advance review copy of A Mirror Murder and it's an excellent book!



For anyone wishing to connect with Helen or buy her books, here are all her links:


A Mirror Murder getbook.at/MirrorMurder 

Website: https://helenhollick.net/

Amazon Author Page (Universal Link) http://viewauthor.at/HelenHollick 

Newsletter Subscription: http://tinyletter.com/HelenHollick 

Twitter: @HelenHollick


Discovering Diamonds Historical Fiction Review Blog (submissions welcome) : https://discoveringdiamonds.blogspot.co.uk/



All that it remains for me to do is to thank Helen, not only for being a guest on my blog today but also for her novels, which have given me hours of reading pleasure, and her tireless work in helping other authors. I take my hat off to her, whereas, as this photo shows, she likes to keep hers on!

Thursday, 15 November 2018

Review & Giveaway: Silk and the Sword by Sharon Bennett Connolly

What an ingenious concept: to examine the lives of and the roles played by the women related to the more familiar, male, characters involved in the events immediately before and after the Norman Conquest.



Silk and the Sword sensibly begins with events which far preceded those of 1066, giving the reader an introduction to the main families involved, and some background information which shows that we cannot take the events of 1066 in isolation.

This earlier history - of the powerful families of Mercia, Lady Godiva, the Godwines, and Queen Emma and both her husbands - is very familiar to me and if I'm honest there were times when I knew that there was more behind certain parts of the story, but that's me, that's not most folk. I have just had a history of Mercia published, so all my research is still very fresh in my mind. For those who are new to this period, or even those who aren't, there is plenty of meat on the bones of the story. 


Harald's wife Elisiv of Kiev,
daughter of Yaroslav the Wise
Does this mean though that there were no surprises in the book for me and nothing new to learn? Far from it. All the well-known women are here, as one would expect - Emma, Edith of Wessex, Edith 'Swanneck' - but so too are the wives of Harald Hardrada. I knew nothing about these women and I thoroughly enjoyed being whisked across the sea to learn about those close to the man described here as 'the wild card in the events of 1066'. It's easy to forget, because of his ultimate defeat, that he was a powerful ruler whose success in England, had it come, would have seen England absorbed into a Scandinavian empire. I had little idea about his royal pedigree (stretching back through his mother's line to the first king of Norway) nor, indeed, that Harald was married to two women at the same time! 

With the inclusion of Matilda of Flanders even the most ardently pro-Saxon reader will be forced to look at things from a different perspective and Gundrada de Warenne, someone I've not read about more than in passing, is given a chapter of her own and the stories behind her alleged parentage fully explored.

What I do know, because of the book that I'm currently writing, is that it is very difficult to format a book like this. Great care has been taken to skilfully extract these women from the general narrative and talk about them in isolation, whilst keeping the facts of their lives in context. 

Inevitably there is crossover, but rather than repeating herself, the author simply signposts where we are, and that we've been here before, but now we're with a different woman and we're looking at things from a different woman's perspective.

The author is keen for us to share her knowledge and interest in all the women, although I suspect she might have her favourites. Whilst she gives sympathetic and even-handed treatment to them all, I felt that there was added affection when it came to the poignancy of Edith Swanneck's tale and of Gytha, mother of the Godwine brood.

This was an ambitious project, beautifully executed and yes, as I've said, much of it very familiar to me. But the genius touch was to incorporate the stories of women from other countries because actually, it's completely logical. If you're telling the story of the women of 1066 then of course we need to know about the wives of Harald Hardrada and William of Normandy. This is where I was on less familiar ground and fascinating it was, too.

This book is a light, easy read, but it's also full of depth. Whether you are reading about these events for the first time or with a working knowledge of them, the lead-up to and the aftermath of the Conquest, with chapters entitled, for example, 'Grief and Sufferings', give an altogether different viewpoint on proceedings.

I was privileged to receive a pre-publication copy of Silk and the Sword but one lucky winner can also receive a free copy. Sharon is giving away a hardback copy of the book to readers worldwide. Simply leave a comment below - Please don't forget to leave your contact details! - and one name will be chosen at random at 7pm GMT Wednesday 21st November 2018